Description

You will choose a film to watch from a given list and then write a report answering a set of questions based on ethical issues derived from the film. Your report should be approx. 2,000 words (+/- 10%).

Use the first column of the rubric below for a proper structure. Make sure you address all three sections!

To find the questions for Section C: People -> Groups -> Visit your film -> Files

Criterion

A

B

C

D

F

Section A

Weight: 25%

Write a few words about the film.

Describe briefly the plot and the main characters.

Identify the main ethical issues.

Examine the behavior of the main actors based on the different theories discussed in class.

Concise and precise description of plot and characters

Recognize almost all the ethical issues of individual and business activities

Compare and contrast multiple ethical frameworks in describing the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

Good description of plot and characters.

Recognize most of the ethical issues of individual and business activities

Use of more than one ethical frameworks to describe the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

Satisfying description of plot and characters

Recognize some of the ethical issues of individual and business activities.

Use of one or two ethical frameworks to describe the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

Plot is not described in a clear manner and important characters have not been identifies.

Recognize few of the ethical issues of individual and business activities

Unorganized, non-systematic description of the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

Poor description of plot and characters

Cannot recognize the ethical issues of individual and business activities

Cannot relate the behaviors to the theories

Section B

Weight 15%

Write your opinion and feelings for the film.

What impact (if any) it had on you?

How do you judge the behavior of the main characters?

Opinion is clearly stated, focused, and strongly maintained

Opinion is communicated clearly within the context

The reflection moves beyond simple description of the experience to an analysis of how the experience contributed to student understanding of self, others, and course concepts.

Opinion is clear and for the most part maintained, though some loosely related material may be present

Context provided for the claim is adequate

May be clearly focused on the opinion but is insufficiently sustained

Opinion on the issue may be unclear and unfocused

May be very brief

Opinion may be confusing or ambiguous

No opinion expressed

Lack of reflection

Section C

Weight: 50%

Answer the three questions and provide a thorough explanation for why you arrived at the answer you did.

Convincing and analytically sound.

Demonstrates a very good level of critical thought.

Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples accurately

Employs sound reasoning, arguments, and/or support

Demonstrates the use of evaluating, analyzing, and applying skills.

Convincing and, for the most part, analytically sound.

Demonstrates a good level of critical thought.

Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples, however

Employs good reasoning, arguments, and/or support

Demonstrates the use of analyzing and applying skills

Generally convincing and, for the most part, analytically sound.

Demonstrates some level of critical thought.

Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples, however, some inaccurate information is included

Employs inferential reasoning, arguments, and/or support

Demonstrates some evidence of analyzing skills

Less than convincing or is not analytically sound.

Demonstrates limited critical thought.

Cites inaccurate or inappropriate examples

Employs little evidence of reasoning, argument, and/or support

Demonstrates little evidence of any apparent analyzing skills

Less than convincing and is not analytically sound.

Does not demonstrate critical thought

No examples used

Employs no evidence of reasoning, argument, and/or support

Demonstrates no evidence of any analyzing skills

Format, Grammar, Referencing

Weight: 10%

Professional format

Error free or nearly error free

Correctly and clearly incorporated source material into the paper, documented sources accurately and correct

Professional format with some minor mistakes

A few errors, but nothing too serious

Correctly and clearly incorporated source material into the paper, documented sources accurately and correct with some minor mistakes

Professional format with some mistakes

Some serious errors, but not many

No more than a few clarity problems incorporating source material or in documenting sources accurately and correctly

Non-professional format

Several serious errors

Frequently incorporated source material unclearly or documented sources inaccurately or incorrectly

Problematic format

Errors throughout

Lack of bibliography/referencing

Failure to cite your sources appropriately will result in score reduction and may result in disciplinary action for plagiarism with the Deanery.

Rubric

Film Report Rubric (2)

Film Report Rubric (2)

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection A: Report Section A Weight: 25% Write a few words about the film. Describe briefly the plot and the main characters. Identify the main ethical issues. Examine the behavior of the main actors based on the different theories discussed in class.

25 pts

Concise and precise description of plot and characters Recognize almost all the ethical issues of individual and business activities Compare and contrast multiple ethical frameworks in describing the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

22.5 pts

Good description of plot and characters. Recognize most of the ethical issues of individual and business activities Use of more than one ethical frameworks to describe the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

20 pts

Satisfying description of plot and characters Recognize some of the ethical issues of individual and business activities. Use of one or two ethical frameworks to describe the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

17.5 pts

Plot is not described in a clear manner and important characters have not been identifies. Recognize few of the ethical issues of individual and business activities Unorganized, non-systematic description of the legitimate rights and responsibilities of multiple stakeholders

15 pts

Poor description of plot and characters Cannot recognize the ethical issues of individual and business activities Cannot relate the behaviors to the theories

0 pts

Not addressed

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection B Weight 15% Write your opinion and feelings for the film. What impact (if any) it had on you? How do you judge the behavior of the main characters?

15 pts

Opinion is clearly stated, focused, and strongly maintained Opinion is communicated clearly within the context The reflection moves beyond simple description of the experience to an analysis of how the experience contributed to student understanding of self, others, and course concepts.

13.5 pts

Opinion is clear and for the most part maintained, though some loosely related material may be present Context provided for the claim is adequate

12 pts

May be clearly focused on the opinion but is insufficiently sustained Opinion on the issue may be unclear and unfocused

10.5 pts

May be very brief Opinion may be confusing or ambiguous

9 pts

Very limited

0 pts

No opinion expressed Lack of reflection

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection C Weight: 50% Answer the three questions and provide a thorough explanation for why you arrived at the answer you did.

50 pts

Convincing and analytically sound. Demonstrates a very good level of critical thought. Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples accurately. Employs sound reasoning, arguments, and/or support. Demonstrates the use of evaluating, analyzing, and applying skills.

45 pts

Convincing and, for the most part, analytically sound. Demonstrates a good level of critical thought. Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples. Employs good reasoning, arguments, and/or support. Demonstrates the use of analyzing and applying skills.

40 pts

Generally convincing and, for the most part, analytically sound. Demonstrates some level of critical thought. Cites and explains appropriate content-specific examples, however, some inaccurate information is included. Employs inferential reasoning, arguments, and/or support. Demonstrates some evidence of analyzing skills.

35 pts

Less than convincing or is not analytically sound. Demonstrates limited critical thought. Cites inaccurate or inappropriate examples. Employs little evidence of reasoning, argument, and/or support. Demonstrates little evidence of any apparent analyzing skills.

30 pts

Less than convincing and is not analytically sound. Does not demonstrate critical thought. No examples used Employs no evidence of reasoning, argument, and/or support. Demonstrates no evidence of any analyzing skills.

0 pts

Not addressed

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat, Grammar, Referencing Weight: 10%

10 pts

Professional format. Error free or nearly error free. Correctly and clearly incorporated source material into the paper, documented sources accurately and correct.

9 pts

Professional format with some minor mistakes. A few errors, but nothing too serious. Correctly and clearly incorporated source material into the paper, documented sources accurately and correct with some minor mistakes.

8 pts

Professional format with some mistakes. Some serious errors, but not many. No more than a few clarity problems incorporating source material or in documenting sources accurately and correctly.

7 pts

Non-professional format. Several serious errors. Frequently incorporated source material unclearly or documented sources inaccurately or incorrectly.

6 pts

Problematic format. Errors throughout. Lack of bibliography/referencing

0 pts

Unaccepptable Format

10 pts

Total Points: 100